Events/Feeder Vila Nova de Gaia 2026/Men's doubles

Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel v Seyfried Joe/Picard Vincent, men's doubles round of 16, Feeder Vila Nova de Gaia 2026

Round of 16Men's doublesOfficial result
POL
Kubik Maciej/Michna SamuelWinner
3-0Games
FRA
Seyfried Joe/Picard VincentFrance
17:19 localfirst point, Fri 6 Nov (UTC)
20 minmatch length
33-20points won
Best of 5games to 11, win by 2

Game by game

Points, and the match score after each game
GameSamuelVincentGames
Game 11171-0
Game 21192-0
Game 31143-0
Kubik Maciej/Michna SamuelSeyfried Joe/Picard Vincent

Point by point

Every score our live tracking saw, with who served
Game 1: score after each look, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel firstEnds 11-7
1-01-11-22-23-23-34-35-36-36-47-47-58-59-59-610-610-711-7
Seyfried Joe/Picard Vincentserved first
3-0longest run, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel from 3-3 to 6-3
From 3-3last level, then Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel pulled away
Game 2: score after each look, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel firstEnds 11-9
1-01-11-22-23-24-24-35-35-46-46-57-58-69-79-810-810-911-9
Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuelserved first
3-0longest run, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel from 1-2 to 4-2
From 2-2last level, then Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel pulled away
Game 3: score after each look, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel firstEnds 11-4
1-02-02-13-14-15-15-25-36-37-38-39-39-410-411-4
Seyfried Joe/Picard Vincentserved first
4-0longest run, Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel from 5-3 to 9-3
Never levelKubik Maciej/Michna Samuel led from the first point
Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel wins the pointSeyfried Joe/Picard Vincent wins the pointdot above: Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel served; dot below: Seyfried Joe/Picard Vincent servedmore than one point between two looks

Match facts

Event
Feeder Vila Nova de Gaia 2026
Round
Round of 16
First point
17:19 local, 17:19 UTC
Scheduled
17:05 local, 17:05 UTC
Length
20 min
Table
Table 4
Format
Best of 5, to 11, win by 2
Timeouts
Kubik Maciej/Michna Samuel 0, Seyfried Joe/Picard Vincent 1
Video review
Not used
Longest game
Game 2, 11-9
Came from behind
No